
For founders
94.8% of home pages fail accessibility. The fixes also lift conversion
WebAIM's 2025 scan of a million home pages found 94.8% with detectable accessibility failures, averaging 51 errors per page. The three most common, low-contrast text, missing alt text and unlabelled form fields, are also three of the most common reasons a visitor does not convert.
Prashant Kumar Singh · · 4 min read
In short
- WebAIM Million 2025: 94.8% of home pages had WCAG 2 failures, averaging 51 errors per page.
- Top three failures: low-contrast text on 79.1% of pages, missing alternative text on 55.5%, missing form labels on 48.2%.
- Each of the three also hurts conversion for every visitor. Fix contrast, label every field, describe every meaningful image.
Every year WebAIM runs an automated accessibility scan across the home pages of the top million websites. The 2025 results: 94.8% of pages had detectable WCAG 2 failures, with an average of 51 errors per page. The number has barely moved in years, which says less about difficulty than about priority.
The case for fixing it is usually made on ethics and law, and both are sound. This post makes a third case, because the three most common failures in WebAIM's data are also three of the most common reasons any visitor, with or without a disability, fails to do what the page wanted them to do.
1. Low-contrast text (79.1% of pages)
Light grey text on white. Placeholder text used as labels. A muted palette that looked refined in the design file. WebAIM found low-contrast text on nearly four in five home pages, making it the most common failure by a wide margin. For a user with low vision it is unreadable. For everyone else it is slower to read, on a phone in daylight it is invisible, and a button whose label cannot be read does not get pressed.
Fix: body text at a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 against its background, large text at 3:1. Check it with a contrast tool, in the design file and again in the browser. Grey text is a style choice; unreadable grey text is a conversion leak.
2. Missing alternative text (55.5% of pages)
Images with no alt attribute, or an alt that says "image". For a screen-reader user the image does not exist. For a search engine the image carries no meaning. For a visitor on a slow connection waiting for a hero image to load, there is no text to tell them what they are waiting for. Product screenshots, feature illustrations and the chart on the pricing page all lose their value when they fail to load or cannot be read.
Fix: every meaningful image gets an alt that says what it shows and why it is there. Decorative images get an empty alt so they are skipped. The writing discipline this imposes, saying in a sentence what the image is for, tends to improve the images.
3. Missing form labels (48.2% of pages)
A field with placeholder text and no label. The placeholder disappears when the user starts typing, so they no longer know what the field was for. A screen reader announces "edit text" with no hint. Autofill cannot match the field. Nearly half of home pages have at least one such field, and sign-up and contact forms are where they live.
Fix: a visible label for every field, associated with it in the markup, and placeholders used only for examples of format. Properly labelled forms get completed more often by everyone, because the user never loses track of what they are filling in, and because the browser can help.
| Failure | Pages affected | Who it blocks | Conversion effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-contrast text | 79.1% | Low vision, everyone outdoors | Unread copy, unpressed buttons |
| Missing alt text | 55.5% | Screen-reader users, slow connections, search | Images that carry no meaning |
| Missing form labels | 48.2% | Screen-reader users, autofill, anyone who looks away | Abandoned forms |
Where to start
Run an automated checker on your home page and your sign-up form. It will find the three failures above in minutes. Fix contrast first, because it is a design-token change that fixes the whole site at once. Then labels on the forms that matter. Then alt text on the images that carry meaning. An afternoon's work, on most sites, and the conversion effect shows up in the forms.
Questions people ask
- What percentage of websites fail accessibility?
- WebAIM's 2025 scan of the top one million home pages found 94.8% with detectable WCAG 2 failures, averaging 51 errors per page.
- What are the most common web accessibility errors?
- In WebAIM Million 2025: low-contrast text (79.1% of pages), missing alternative text on images (55.5%), and missing form input labels (48.2%).
- Does accessibility improve conversion?
- The most common accessibility failures, unreadable text, meaningless images and unlabelled form fields, are also usability failures for every visitor. Fixing them makes copy readable, images meaningful and forms easier to complete for everyone.
If you're a founder
Send your home page and sign-up form. The free teardown will include the contrast, label and alt-text fixes alongside the product ones.
If you run an AI lab or data team
Task instructions have an accessibility equivalent: a spec that depends on colour in a screenshot, or on an image with no description, is a spec some authors and all models will misread.
Sources